Skip to main content

Table 3 Item difficulty, item fit statistics, and correlations (n = 126)

From: Refinement of an instrument measuring science teachers’ knowledge of language through mixed method

Item

Difficulty

δ

Outfit

MNSQ

Outfit.t

Infit

MNSQ

Infit.t

Item-Total Alpha

Alpha if Item Deleted

LQ01R

-0.58

1.21

1.63

1.09

0.72

0.33

0.61

LQ03R

-0.96

1.08

0.58

1.05

0.37

0.52

0.57

LQ05

-1.00

1.08

0.56

0.99

-0.05

0.30

0.61

LQ06

-0.40

1.12

1.02

1.03

0.31

0.11

0.64

LQ07R

-2.26

0.76

-1.61

0.74

-1.69

0.51

0.60

LQ11

-1.19

0.85

-0.97

0.83

-1.14

0.63

0.57

LQ12R

-1.32

0.92

-0.49

0.87

-0.81

0.48

0.60

LQ16R

-0.43

1.26

2.13

1.18

1.51

0.18

0.64

LQ17R

-2.37

0.70

-2.06

0.73

-1.85

0.68

0.59

LQ18

-1.38

0.94

-0.32

0.94

-0.31

0.55

0.58

LQ20Ra

-2.51

0.87

-0.80

0.89

-0.64

0.43

0.61

LQ22Ra

-0.77

1.51

3.42

1.38

2.67

-0.09

0.67

LQ24Rb

-1.85

0.77

-1.47

0.73

-1.71

0.68

0.58

LQ26a

-0.43

1.35

2.83

1.26

2.14

0.14

0.64

LQ100a

-1.27

1.30

1.75

1.16

1.02

0.30

0.62

  1. (1) a means those items should be coded reversed in data analysis
  2. (2) b Because LQ24R doesn’t have category 1 response, recode 0 category as 1, so there is continuous with category 2, 3, and 4
  3. (3) Item-total correlation was calculated by alpha () function in psych package in r language (r.cor = item-total correlation)