Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (Eds.) (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science: Review conducted by the TTA-supported science review group. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Google Scholar
Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151.
Article
Google Scholar
Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Book
Google Scholar
Eilks, I., & Hofstein, A. (Eds.) (2015). Relevant chemistry education: From theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933.
Article
Google Scholar
Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Book
Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975/1988). Against method (Revised ed.). London: Verso.
Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130.
Article
Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.) (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. W. (2007). School science: a questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 265–282.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and microchemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377–379.
Google Scholar
Josephson, P. R. (1992). Soviet scientists and the state: Politics, ideology, and fundamental research from Stalin to Gorbachev. Social Research, 59(3), 589–614.
Google Scholar
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the Bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056.
Article
Google Scholar
Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas, (2nd ed., ). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Google Scholar
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1959/1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change, (pp. 225–239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, (2nd ed., ). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1974/1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change, (pp. 293–319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
National Research Council Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576.
Article
Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge, (5th ed., ). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exlporing the contribution of integrated curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Sadovnik, A. R. (1991). Basil Bernstein's theory of pedagogic practice: A structuralist approach. Sociology of Education, 64(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112891.
Article
Google Scholar
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry (the Inglis lecture, 1961). In J. J. Schwab, & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge: Harvard Univewrsity Press.
Google Scholar
Sevian, H. (2017). What is chemistry education research (CER)? - letter to the editor. Educación Química, 28(4), 195–308.
Article
Google Scholar
Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00111c.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions - prevention, diagnosis and cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2006). Conceptual integration: A demarcation criterion for science education? Physics Education, 41(4), 286–287.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2007). Choice for the gifted: Lessons from teaching about scientific explanations. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners, (pp. 158–171). London: Routledge.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2009). Learning at the symbolic level. In J. K. Gilbert, & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education, (pp. 75–108). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2010). Straw men and false dichotomies: Overcoming philosophical confusion in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(5), 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8001623.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2013a). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2013b). Three levels of chemistry educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 151–155.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2014). Methodological issues in science education research: A perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, (pp. 1839–1893). Netherlands: Springer.
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2015). Epistemic relevance and learning chemistry in an academic context. In I. Eilks, & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education: From theory to practice, (pp. 79–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2017). Is CER best considered a discipline or a field of study? Reply to Hannah Sevian's comment. Educacion Quimica, 28, 304–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2017.06.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2018a). Knowledge sans frontières? Conceptualising STEM in the curriculum to facilitate creativity and knowledge integration. In K. S. Taber, M. Sumida, & L. McClure (Eds.), Teaching gifted learners in STEM subjects: Developing talent in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, (pp. 1–19). Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2018b). Masterclass in science education: Transforming teaching and learning. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2018c). Scaffolding learning: Principles for effective teaching and the design of classroom resources. In M. Abend (Ed.), Effective teaching and learning: Perspectives, strategies and implementation, (pp. 1–43). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2019a). The nature of the chemical concept: Constructing chemical knowledge in teaching and learning. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (2019b). Experimental research into teaching innovations: responding to methodological and ethical challenges. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658058.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (2000). Learners’ explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(3), 329–353.
Google Scholar
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435.
Article
Google Scholar
Teo, T. W., Goh, M. T., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). Chemistry education research trends: 2004-2013. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00104D.
Article
Google Scholar
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Paper presented at the UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings. http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/6375
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (vol. 2, pp. 697–726). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar