Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (Eds.) (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science: Review conducted by the TTA-supported science review group. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151.
Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eilks, I., & Hofstein, A. (Eds.) (2015). Relevant chemistry education: From theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933.
Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Feyerabend, P. (1975/1988). Against method (Revised ed.). London: Verso.
Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130.
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.) (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jenkins, E. W. (2007). School science: a questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 265–282.
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and microchemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377–379.
Josephson, P. R. (1992). Soviet scientists and the state: Politics, ideology, and fundamental research from Stalin to Gorbachev. Social Research, 59(3), 589–614.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the Bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056.
Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas, (2nd ed., ). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285.
Kuhn, T. S. (1959/1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change, (pp. 225–239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, (2nd ed., ). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S. (1974/1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change, (pp. 293–319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576.
Popper, K. R. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge, (5th ed., ). London: Routledge.
Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exlporing the contribution of integrated curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sadovnik, A. R. (1991). Basil Bernstein's theory of pedagogic practice: A structuralist approach. Sociology of Education, 64(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112891.
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry (the Inglis lecture, 1961). In J. J. Schwab, & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge: Harvard Univewrsity Press.
Sevian, H. (2017). What is chemistry education research (CER)? - letter to the editor. Educación Química, 28(4), 195–308.
Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00111c.
Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions - prevention, diagnosis and cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. S. (2006). Conceptual integration: A demarcation criterion for science education? Physics Education, 41(4), 286–287.
Taber, K. S. (2007). Choice for the gifted: Lessons from teaching about scientific explanations. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners, (pp. 158–171). London: Routledge.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Learning at the symbolic level. In J. K. Gilbert, & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education, (pp. 75–108). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2010). Straw men and false dichotomies: Overcoming philosophical confusion in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(5), 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8001623.
Taber, K. S. (2013a). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E.
Taber, K. S. (2013b). Three levels of chemistry educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 151–155.
Taber, K. S. (2014). Methodological issues in science education research: A perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, (pp. 1839–1893). Netherlands: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2015). Epistemic relevance and learning chemistry in an academic context. In I. Eilks, & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education: From theory to practice, (pp. 79–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Taber, K. S. (2017). Is CER best considered a discipline or a field of study? Reply to Hannah Sevian's comment. Educacion Quimica, 28, 304–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2017.06.003.
Taber, K. S. (2018a). Knowledge sans frontières? Conceptualising STEM in the curriculum to facilitate creativity and knowledge integration. In K. S. Taber, M. Sumida, & L. McClure (Eds.), Teaching gifted learners in STEM subjects: Developing talent in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, (pp. 1–19). Abingdon: Routledge.
Taber, K. S. (2018b). Masterclass in science education: Transforming teaching and learning. London: Bloomsbury.
Taber, K. S. (2018c). Scaffolding learning: Principles for effective teaching and the design of classroom resources. In M. Abend (Ed.), Effective teaching and learning: Perspectives, strategies and implementation, (pp. 1–43). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Taber, K. S. (2019a). The nature of the chemical concept: Constructing chemical knowledge in teaching and learning. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. S. (2019b). Experimental research into teaching innovations: responding to methodological and ethical challenges. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658058.
Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (2000). Learners’ explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(3), 329–353.
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435.
Teo, T. W., Goh, M. T., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). Chemistry education research trends: 2004-2013. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00104D.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Paper presented at the UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings. http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/6375
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (vol. 2, pp. 697–726). New York: Routledge.